Heart Rhythm
Volume 3, Issue 7 , Pages 824-831, July 2006

Recreating an artificial biological pacemaker: Insights from a theoretical model

  • Prakash C. Viswanathan, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence: Prakash C. Viswanathan, Ph.D., 1704.3 Biomedical Science Tower, 200 Lothrop Street, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
  • ,
  • James A. Coles Jr., PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiac Rhythm Management, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Vinod Sharma, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiac Rhythm Management, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • ,
  • Daniel C. Sigg, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiac Rhythm Management, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota

Received 22 October 2005; accepted 6 March 2006. published online 17 March 2006.

Background

Normal cardiac rhythm is critically dependent on the sinoatrial (SA) node, the natural biological pacemaker. Although recent studies have focused on the development of “artificial” biological pacemakers using gene transfer, less is known about the functional consequences of such interventions.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the electrophysiological consequences of two approaches used to create a biological pacemaker: overexpression of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated channel (HCN “pacemaker” channels) and suppression of the inward-rectifier potassium current, IK1.

Methods

We used a linear multicellular Luo-Rudy (LRd) AP model consisting of 130 ventricular cells connected by resistive gap junctions. To induce automaticity, IK1 current was reduced or If (HCN) current was introduced in endocardial and midmyocardial (M) cells.

Results

Similar to the previously published results for a single LRd model, myocyte IK1 suppression induced automaticity in the fiber. While introduction of If also resulted in automaticity, the main differences between IK1 suppression and If expression were (1) a relatively more gradual phase 4 depolarization with HCN expression, (2) stabilization of cycle lengths during IK1 suppression, but not during HCN expression, and (3) responsiveness to β-adrenergic stimulation during HCN expression, but not during IK1 suppression. Upon further investigation, we found that cycle length instability during HCN expression was primarily due to a gradual reduction of intracellular potassium ([K+]i) from its baseline value of 142 mM to 120 mM in 600 beats and subsequent alteration of potassium-dependent ionic currents. A twofold increase in HCN expression also led to a similar behavior. We attribute this decrease in [K+]i to a large IK1 during phase 4 depolarization. When intracellular [K+]i loss was minimized, cycle lengths stabilized during HCN expression.

Conclusions

Our results help to further understand the electrophysiologic consequences as well as some of the challenges associated with the creation of biological pacemakers using HCN and IK1 gene transfer strategies.

Keywords:  Computer modeling , Pacemaker , Gene therapy , Inward rectifier , Pacemaker channel

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This research was supported by Medtronic Inc.

PII: S1547-5271(06)01242-2

doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.03.012

Heart Rhythm
Volume 3, Issue 7 , Pages 824-831, July 2006