Heart Rhythm
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 595-602, May 2007

On the accuracy of CartoMerge for guiding posterior left atrial ablation in man

  • Hua Zhong, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Joan M. Lacomis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Drs. Schwartzman and Lacomis have in the past or are currently receiving funding in the form of research grants (unrelated to this study) and/or lecture/consulting fees from the following companies: General Electric Healthcare Systems, Medtronic, EP Medsystems, St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, and/or Biosense Webster.
  • ,
  • David Schwartzman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
    • Drs. Schwartzman and Lacomis have in the past or are currently receiving funding in the form of research grants (unrelated to this study) and/or lecture/consulting fees from the following companies: General Electric Healthcare Systems, Medtronic, EP Medsystems, St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, and/or Biosense Webster.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence: David Schwartzman, M.D., UPMC Presbyterian, B535, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582.

Received 19 December 2006; accepted 29 January 2007. published online 13 February 2007.

Background

Recent reports suggest that the CartoMerge system is useful for guiding human posterior left atrial (PLA) endocardial ablation.

Objective

To assess the accuracy of the CartoMerge system during PLA ablation.

Methods

Sixteen patients undergoing PLA catheter ablation were studied. In each patient, registration of preoperative computed tomographic (CT) and intraoperative electroanatomic left atrial images was performed to create CartoMerge images. Encircling of right and left pulmonary venous vestibules with ablation points was then performed guided solely by intracardiac echocardiography, with point locations saved on a CartoMerge image to which the operator was blinded. The accuracy of the CartoMerge image was then assessed by measuring the distance from the location of each ablation point on the image to its actual anatomic location. In five patients, accuracy of registration of each of three left atrial CT images (just prior to mitral valve opening, at end-diastasis, at end-atrial contraction) with the electroanatomic image was compared. In two patients, accuracy of registration using left atrial image data alone was compared with that which used both left atrial and thoracic aorta image data.

Results

In each patient, inaccuracy of the CartoMerge image was apparent, the magnitude of which was similar for right- and left-vestibule ablation points. Accuracy was significantly improved when the end-atrial contraction CT image was used for registration. The inclusion of thoracic aorta image data did not improve accuracy.

Conclusions

The CartoMerge system is inaccurate. Inaccuracy may be reduced by using CT and electroanatomic images obtained at the same point in the atrial mechanical cycle.

Keywords: Atrial, Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Intracardiac echocardiography, Electroanatomic mapping

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1547-5271(07)00111-7

doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.01.033

Heart Rhythm
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 595-602, May 2007