« Previous
Next »
Heart Rhythm
Volume 7, Issue 1
, Pages
99-107
, January 2010
In vitro tests reveal sample radiofrequency identification readers inducing clinically significant electromagnetic interference to implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
-
Percentage of pacemaker reactions graded for clinical significance. The percentage of tests with a reaction for pacemakers graded for clinical significance (there were no class II reactions). Pacemake
Percentage of pacemaker reactions graded for clinical significance. The percentage of tests with a reaction for pacemakers graded for clinical significance (there were no class II reactions). Pacemaker tests at nominal sensitivity during HF RFID exposure had 1% class I reactions and 1% class III reactions. HF = high frequency; LF = low frequency; RFID = radiofrequency identification; UHF = ultra high frequency; Max = maximum sensitivity; Nom = nominal sensitivity.
-
Percentage of ICD reactions graded for clinical significance. The percentage of tests with a reaction for ICDs graded for clinical significance (there were no class II reactions). ICD = implantable caPercentage of ICD reactions graded for clinical significance. The percentage of tests with a reaction for ICDs graded for clinical significance (there were no class II reactions). ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; other abbreviations as in Figure 2.
-
Percentage of pacemaker reactions versus distance. The percentage of pacemaker tests (at each sensitivity level) with a reaction within distance ranges during LF and HF RFID exposure. There were no paPercentage of pacemaker reactions versus distance. The percentage of pacemaker tests (at each sensitivity level) with a reaction within distance ranges during LF and HF RFID exposure. There were no pacemaker reactions caused by either of the 2 UHF RFID readers. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
-
Percentage of ICD reactions versus distance. The percentage of ICD tests (at each sensitivity level) with a reaction within distance ranges during LF and HF RFID exposure. There were no ICD reactionsPercentage of ICD reactions versus distance. The percentage of ICD tests (at each sensitivity level) with a reaction within distance ranges during LF and HF RFID exposure. There were no ICD reactions caused by either of the 2 UHF RFID readers. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
-
Feed-through filter performance. Performance of 4 different valued feed-through capacitors. The majority of attenuation occurs at 915 MHz (UHF RFID), less attenuation at 13.56 MHz (HF RFID), and lessFeed-through filter performance. Performance of 4 different valued feed-through capacitors. The majority of attenuation occurs at 915 MHz (UHF RFID), less attenuation at 13.56 MHz (HF RFID), and less than 1 dB of attenuation at 134 kHz (LF RFID). Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
Data acquisition was performed by Seidman (FDA) and Guag (FDA), and each device manufacturer provided an engineer for testing of their devices (Clement, Kippola, Digby, Barber, Huntwork). Brockman, Lewis, and Shein (FDA) were responsible for analyzing the clinical significance of the results. No authors have any financial or personal relationships that would influence or bias the authors' decisions, work, or manuscript other than their employment and voluntary, nonpaid membership with the AAMI CRMD EMC Task Force.
The mention of commercial products, their sources, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as either an actual or implied endorsement of such products by the Department of Health and Human Services.
PII: S1547-5271(09)01146-1
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.09.071
« Previous
Next »
Heart Rhythm
Volume 7, Issue 1
, Pages
99-107
, January 2010
