« Previous
Next »
Heart Rhythm
Volume 7, Issue 7
, Pages
876-882
, July 2010
Gender differences in clinical outcome and primary prevention defibrillator benefit in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
-
Forest plot showing adjusted hazard ratio of overall mortality (whole study population) (A) and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) intervention (B) in women compared to men in ea
Forest plot showing adjusted hazard ratio of overall mortality (whole study population) (A) and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) intervention (B) in women compared to men in each study and the overall adjusted hazard ratio. Square boxes denote hazard ratio; horizontal lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI).
-
Forest plot showing hazard ratio of survival benefit associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use in women (A) and in men (B) in each study and the overall hazard ratio. Square boxForest plot showing hazard ratio of survival benefit associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use in women (A) and in men (B) in each study and the overall hazard ratio. Square boxes denote hazard ratio; horizontal lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI). In SCD-HeFT, placebo denotes the no-amiodarone group; in COMPANION, placebo denotes the standard medical therapy group (no cardiac resynchronization therapy).
Dr. Natale has received compensation for belonging to the speakers' bureau for St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Biosense Webster and has received a research grant from St. Jude Medical.
PII: S1547-5271(10)00336-X
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.03.042
© 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Heart Rhythm
Volume 7, Issue 7
, Pages
876-882
, July 2010
