Advertisement

How to avoid inappropriate shocks

Published:January 18, 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.015
      Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) usage has increased dramatically over the past decade. In part this is due to improved patient survival after myocardial infarction, but principally this is due to the increased number of implants for primary prevention. While the salutary effects of ICD therapy in this population of patients are generally accepted, complications from ICD implantation have become a common and pressing issue. First among these complications, both in terms of frequency and impact on quality of life, is inappropriate ICD therapy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart Rhythm
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kuhlkamp V.
        • Dornberger V.
        • Bosch R.R.
        • et al.
        Is it safe to program a long tachycardia detection interval?.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13: 1169-1172
        • Wathen M.S.
        • DeGroot P.J.
        • Sweeney M.O.
        • et al.
        • PainFREE Rx II Investigators
        Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial results.
        Circulation. 2004; 110: 2591-2596
        • Wilkoff B.L.
        • Stern R.
        • Williamson B.
        • et al.
        Aggressively programmed implantable defibrillator detection and therapy reduces shocks compared to physician-tailored programming in primary prevention patients: Results from the PREPARE trial.
        2007 (Heart Rhythm Society 2007 Scientific Sessions, May 10, Denver, Colorado.)
        • Gunderson B.D.
        • Abeyratne A.I.
        • Olson W.H.
        • et al.
        Effect of programmed number of intervals to detect ventricular fibrillation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator aborted and unnecessary shocks.
        PACE. 2007; 30: 157-165
        • Berger R.D.
        • Lerew D.R.
        • Smith J.M.
        • et al.
        The Rhythm ID Going Head to Head Trial (RIGHT): design of a randomized trial comparing competitive rhythm discrimination algorithms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17: 749-753
        • Friedman P.A.
        • McClelland R.L.
        • Bamlet W.R.
        • et al.
        Dual-chamber versus single-chamber detection enhancements for implantable defibrillator rhythm diagnosis: the detect supraventricular tachycardia study.
        Circulation. 2006; 113: 2871-2879