Advertisement

Increasing hazard of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure

Published:February 23, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.024

      Background

      The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead is prone to fracture and was recalled in 2007 after 665 failures and five reported deaths. Approximately 150,000 patients at risk for sudden death in the United States have Sprint Fidelis leads. The rate of Sprint Fidelis lead failure may be increasing, and physicians are confronted with the decision to replace the lead prophylactically.

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to determine if the hazard of Sprint Fidelis lead failure is changing and to compare its performance to other contemporary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads.

      Methods

      Transvenous ICD leads implanted and followed at our two tertiary-care referral centers between January 2004 and December 2008 were included in the study. Lead failure data were entered prospectively by both centers via the Multicenter Registry. Clinical data were collected prospectively by each center and merged for the purpose of this study.

      Results

      During 5,700 implant years of follow-up (average 1.9 ± 1.3 years), 94 of 3,037 defibrillator leads failed (1.65%/year), including 72 (8.5%) of 848 Sprint Fidelis leads. The cumulative hazard of Sprint Fidelis failure was significantly greater compared to 2,189 other defibrillator leads (P <.0001), and the hazard of Sprint Fidelis failure accelerated after the first year and continued to increase during the study. In contrast to other defibrillator leads, the Sprint Fidelis failure rate was significantly higher (3.75%/year vs 0.58%/year) and the 3-year estimated survival was significantly lower (87.9% [95% CI 84.8, 90.9] vs 98.5% [95% CI 97.8, 99.3]; P <.0001). The chance that a Sprint Fidelis lead would survive another year decreased progressively during the study. Most Sprint Fidelis failures were caused by pace-sense conductor fracture (n = 63 [87.5%]), which caused inappropriate shocks in 36 of 72 patients.

      Conclusion

      The hazard of Sprint Fidelis lead failure is increasing, whereas the failure rates of other defibrillator leads are low and stable. Physicians should consider these data when managing patients who have Sprint Fidelis leads.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart Rhythm
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hauser R.G.
        • Kallinen L.M.
        • Almquist A.K.
        • et al.
        Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.
        Heart Rhythm. 2007; 4: 892-896
        • Krahn A.D.
        • Champagne J.
        • Healey J.S.
        • et al.
        Outcome of the Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead advisory: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.
        Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5: 639-642
      1. Urgent Medical Device Information: Sprint Fidelis Lead Patient Management Recommendations.
        Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MNOctober 15, 2007
      2. Product Performance Report 2008, 2nd Edition. Minneapolis, MN: Medtronic, Inc., Issue 59, p. 86.

        • Farwell D.
        • Green M.S.
        • Lemery R.
        • et al.
        Accelerating risk of Fidelis lead fracture.
        Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5: 1375-1379
      3. Sprint Fidelis Model 6949 Lead Performance. Available at http://www.medtronic.com/product-advisories/physician/sprint-fidelis/6949-LEAD-PERFORMANCE.htm. Accessed January 7, 2009.

      4. Sprint Fidelis Lead Performance Update (Models 6949, 6948, 6931, 6930). Letter to Physicians, May 7, 2008. Available at http://www.medtronic.com/product-advisories/physician/sprint-fidelis/index.htm. Accessed January 7, 2009.

        • Field M.E.
        • Jones S.O.
        • Epstein L.M.
        How to select patient for lead extraction.
        Heart Rhythm. 2007; 4: 978-985
        • Hauser R.
        • Hayes D.
        • Parsonnet V.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and initial results of a Internet-based pacemaker and ICD pulse generator and lead registry.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001; 24: 82-87
        • Dorey F.J.
        • Korn E.L.
        Effective sample sizes for confidence intervals for survival probabilities.
        Stat Med. 1987; 6: 679-687
      5. CRM Product Performance Report Q4 2008. Endotak Reliance G Dual Coil, Active Fixation Models 0164/0165/0166/0167/0184/0185/0186/0187. Available at http://www.bostonscientific.com/templatedata/imports/HTML/PPR/ppr/leads/surv/end_rel_g_dua_coi_act_fix_surv.shtml. Accessed January 7, 2009.

        • Product Performance Report
        Cardiac Rhythm Management. October 2008 (Accessed January 7, 2009.)
        • Messali A.
        • Thomas O.
        • Chauvin M.
        • et al.
        Death due to an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15: 953-956
        • Vollmann D.
        • Luthje L.
        • Vonhof S.
        • et al.
        Inappropriate therapy and fatal proarrhythmia by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
        Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2: 307-309
        • Kallinen L.M.
        • Hauser R.G.
        • Lee K.W.
        • et al.
        Failure of impedance monitoring to prevent adverse clinical events caused by fracture of a recalled high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.
        Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5: 775-779
        • Swerdlow C.D.
        • Gunderson B.D.
        • Ousdigian K.T.
        • et al.
        Downloadable lead-integrity algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks in patients with Sprint Fidelis leads.
        Circulation. 2008; 118: 2122-2129
        • Kleeman T.
        • Becker T.
        • Doenges K.
        • et al.
        Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period >10 years.
        Circulation. 2007; 115: 2474-2480
        • Hauser R.G.
        • Cannom D.
        • Hayes D.L.
        • et al.
        Long-term structural failure of coaxial polyurethane implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003; 25: 879-882
        • Eckstein J.
        • Koller M.T.
        • Zabel M.
        • et al.
        Necessity for surgical revision of defibrillator leads implanted long-term.
        Circulation. 2008; 117: 2727-2733