Advertisement

Time to therapy delivery and effectiveness of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

      Background

      At the time of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation, successful termination of ventricular fibrillation (VF) is confirmed. A previous study reported cases of prolonged time to therapy during defibrillation testing.

      Objectives

      We sought to evaluate the time to therapy, identify possible predictors of delay, and investigate the impact of delayed therapy on VF conversion.

      Methods

      We analyzed consecutive patients with S-ICDs who underwent initial conversion testing at a shock energy of 65 J in 53 Italian centers.

      Results

      We analyzed 570 patients (467 [82%] male; mean age 48 ± 15 years; mean body mass index 25 ± 6 kg/m2; mean ejection fraction 47% ± 17%). General anesthesia was used in 165 (29%) of patients, with sub- or intermuscular positioning of the generator in (422; 74%). Cardioversion was successful at 65 J in 557 (97.7%) of patients. In 12 patients (2.1%) the shock did not convert VF, and in 1 patient the shock was not delivered because of noise from entrapped subcutaneous air. All failures were successfully managed by reprogramming or repositioning the device. The mean time to therapy was 15 ± 3 seconds, and it exceeded 18 seconds in 51 patients (9%). Independent predictors of delayed therapy (18 seconds) were ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR] 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96–0.99; P = .016) and a 2× gain programmed (OR 3.66; 95% CI 1.44–9.30; P = .006). Effectiveness at 65 J was not associated with time to therapy (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.97–1.32; P = .122).

      Conclusion

      In this analysis of a large population of patients with S-ICDs, delayed therapy during defibrillation testing occurred less frequently than previously reported and had no effect on VF conversion success. Delayed therapies seemed more common when a vector with a 2× gain was programmed.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart Rhythm
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bardy G.H.
        • Smith W.M.
        • Hood M.A.
        • et al.
        An entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 36-44
        • Weiss R.
        • Knight B.P.
        • Gold M.R.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of a totally subcutaneous implantable-cardioverter defibrillator.
        Circulation. 2013; 128: 944-953
        • Lambiase P.D.
        • Barr C.
        • Theuns D.A.
        • et al.
        • EFFORTLESS Investigators
        Worldwide experience with a totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: early results from the EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry.
        Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 1657-1665
        • Wilkoff B.L.
        • Fauchier L.
        • Stiles M.K.
        • et al.
        • Document Reviewers
        2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.
        Europace. 2017; 19: 580
        • Gold M.R.
        • Aasbo J.D.
        • El-Chami M.F.
        • et al.
        Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator post-approval study: clinical characteristics and perioperative results.
        Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14: 1456-1463
        • Friedman D.J.
        • Parzynski C.S.
        • Varosy P.D.
        • et al.
        Trends and in-hospital outcomes associated with adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the United States.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2016; 1: 900-911
        • Boersma L.
        • Barr C.
        • Knops R.
        • et al.
        • EFFORTLESS Investigator Group
        Implant and midterm outcomes of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry: the EFFORTLESS Study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: 830-841
        • D’Onofrio A.
        • Pieragnoli P.
        • Biffi M.
        • et al.
        • “S-ICD Rhythm Detect” Investigators
        Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: an analysis of Italian clinical practice and its evolution.
        Int J Cardiol. 2018; 272: 162-167
        • le Polain de Waroux J.B.
        • Ploux S.
        • Mondoly P.
        • et al.
        Defibrillation testing is mandatory in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to confirm appropriate ventricular fibrillation detection.
        Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 642-650
        • Ziacchi M.
        • Corzani A.
        • Diemberger I.
        • et al.
        Electrocardiographic eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: evaluation during bicycle exercise.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2016; 25: 476-483
        • Yap S.C.
        • Bhagwandien R.E.
        • Szili-Torok T.
        • Theuns D.A.M.J.
        Air entrapment causing early inappropriate shocks in a patient with a subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator.
        HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2015; 1: 156-158
        • Migliore F.
        • Allocca G.
        • Calzolari V.
        • et al.
        Intermuscular two-incision technique for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: results from a multicenter registry.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017; 40: 278-285
        • Fenelon G.
        • Stambler B.S.
        • Huvelle E.
        • Brugada P.
        • Stevenson W.G.
        • European VENTAK MINI Investigator Group
        Left ventricular dysfunction is associated with prolonged average ventricular fibrillation cycle length in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
        J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2002; 7: 249-254
        • Panfilov I.
        • Lever N.A.
        • Smaill B.H.
        • Larsen P.D.
        Ventricular fibrillation frequency from implanted cardioverter defibrillator devices.
        Europace. 2009; 11: 1052-1056
        • Jiménez-Candil J.
        • Hernández J.
        • Martín A.
        • et al.
        Influence of beta-blocker therapy on antitachycardia pacing effectiveness for monomorphic ventricular tachycardias occurring in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients: a dose-dependent effect.
        Europace. 2010; 12: 1231-1238
        • Friedman D.J.
        • Parzynski C.S.
        • Heist E.K.
        • et al.
        Ventricular fibrillation conversion testing after implantation of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
        Circulation. 2018; 137: 2463-2477
        • Quast A.B.E.
        • Baalman S.W.E.
        • Brouwer T.F.
        • et al.
        A novel tool to evaluate the implant position and predict defibrillation success of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the PRAETORIAN score.
        Heart Rhythm. 2019; 16: 403-410