Advertisement

Active compression versus standard anterior-posterior defibrillation for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A prospective randomized study

Published:November 09, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.11.005

      Background

      Electrical cardioversion is the first-line rhythm control therapy for symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Contemporary use of biphasic shock waveforms and anterior-posterior positioning of defibrillation electrodes have improved cardioversion efficacy; however, it remains unsuccessful in >10% of patients.

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of applying active compression on defibrillation electrodes during AF cardioversion.

      Methods

      We performed a bicenter randomized study including patients referred for persistent AF cardioversion. Elective external cardioversion was performed by a standardized step-up protocol with increasing biphasic shock energy (50–100–150–200 J). Patients were randomly assigned to standard anterior-posterior defibrillation or to defibrillation with active compression applied over the anterior electrode. If sinus rhythm was not achieved at 200 J, a single crossover shock (200 J) was applied. Defibrillation threshold, total delivered energy, number of shocks, and success rate were compared between groups.

      Results

      We included 100 patients, 50 in each group. In the active compression group, defibrillation threshold was lower (103.1 ± 49.9 J vs 130.4 ± 47.7 J; P = .008), as well as total delivered energy (203 ± 173.3 J vs 309 ± 213.5 J; P = .0076) and number of shocks (2.2 ± 1.1 vs 2.9 ± 1.2; P = .0033), and cardioversion was more often successful (48 of 50 patients [96%] vs 42 of 50 patients [84%]; P = .0455) than that in the standard anterior-posterior group. Crossover from the compression group to the standard group was not successful (0 of 2 patients), whereas crossover from the standard group to the compression group was successful in 50% of patients (4 of 8).

      Conclusion

      Active compression applied to the anterior defibrillation electrode is more effective for persistent AF cardioversion than standard anterior-posterior cardioversion, with lower defibrillation threshold and higher success rate.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart Rhythm
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kirchhof P.
        • Benussi S.
        • Kotecha D.
        • et al.
        2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.
        Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 2893-2962
        • Mittal S.
        • Ayati S.
        • Stein K.M.
        • et al.
        Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks.
        Circulation. 2000; 101: 1282-1287
        • Kirchhof P.
        • Eckardt L.
        • Loh P.
        • et al.
        Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2002; 360: 1275-1279
        • Pisters R.
        • Nieuwlaat R.
        • Prins M.H.
        • et al.
        Clinical correlates of immediate success and outcome at 1-year follow-up of real-world cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey.
        Europace. 2012; 14: 666-674
        • Kerber R.E.
        • Grayzel J.
        • Hoyt R.
        • Marcus M.
        • Kennedy J.
        Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation: influence of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure.
        Circulation. 1981; 63: 676-682
        • Sirna S.J.
        • Ferguson D.W.
        • Charbonnier F.
        • Kerber R.E.
        Factors affecting transthoracic impedance during electrical cardioversion.
        Am J Cardiol. 1988; 62: 1048-1052
        • Cohen T.J.
        • Ibrahim B.
        • Denier D.
        • Haji A.
        • Quan W.
        Active compression cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation.
        Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 354-355
        • January C.T.
        • Wann L.S.
        • Alpert J.S.
        • et al.
        2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: e1-e76
        • Vollmann D.
        • Lüthje L.
        • Seegers J.
        • et al.
        Sternal fracture after elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
        Clin Res Cardiol. 2011; 100: 261-262
        • Ewy G.A.
        The optimal technique for electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
        Clin Cardiol. 1994; 17: 79-84
        • Ramirez F.D.
        • Fiset S.L.
        • Cleland M.J.
        • et al.
        Effect of applying force to self-adhesive electrodes on transthoracic impedance: implications for electrical cardioversion.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 39: 1141-1147
        • Deakin C.D.
        • Sado D.M.
        • Petley G.W.
        • Clewlow F.
        Determining the optimal paddle force for external defibrillation.
        Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90: 812-813
        • Lerman B.B.
        • Halperin H.R.
        • Tsitlik J.E.
        • Brin K.
        • Clark C.W.
        • Deale O.C.
        Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold: evidence for current-based defibrillation.
        J Clin Invest. 1987; 80: 797-803
        • Singh S.N.
        • Tang X.C.
        • Reda D.
        • Singh B.N.
        Systematic electrocardioversion for atrial fibrillation and role of antiarrhythmic drugs: a substudy of the SAFE-T trial.
        Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6: 152-155