Advertisement

Close-coupled pacing to identify the “functional” substrate of ventricular tachycardia: Long-term outcomes of the paced electrogram feature analysis technique

Published:December 27, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.12.022

      Background

      The conduction delay and block that compose the critical isthmus of macroreentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) is partly “functional” in that they only occur at faster cycle lengths. Close-coupled pacing stresses the myocardium's conduction capacity and may reveal late potentials (LPs) and fractionation. Interest has emerged in targeting this functional substrate.

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a functional substrate VT ablation strategy.

      Methods

      Patients with scar-related VT undergoing their first ablation were recruited. A closely coupled extrastimulus (ventricular effective refractory period + 30 ms) was delivered at the right ventricular apex while mapping with a high-density catheter. Sites of functional impaired conduction exhibited increased electrogram duration due to LPs/fractionation. The time to last deflection was annotated on an electroanatomic map, readily identifying ablation targets.

      Results

      A total of 40 patients were recruited (34 [85%] ischemic). Median procedure duration was 330 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 300–369), and ablation time was 49.4 minutes (IQR 33.8–48.3). Median functional substrate area was 41.9 cm2 (IQR 22.1–73.9). It was similarly distributed across bipolar voltage zones. Noninducibility was achieved in 34 of 40 patients (85%). Median follow-up was 711 days (IQR 255.5–972.8), during which 35 of 39 patients (89.7%) did not have VT recurrence, and 3 of 39 (7.5%) died. Antiarrhythmic drugs were continued in 53.8% (21/39).

      Conclusion

      Functional substrate ablation resulted in high rates of noninducibility and freedom from VT. Mapping times were increased considerably. Our findings add to the encouraging trend reported by related techniques. Randomized multicenter trials are warranted to assess this next phase of VT ablation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart Rhythm
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sapp J.L.
        • Wells G.A.
        • Parkash R.
        • et al.
        Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 111-121
        • Yousuf O.K.
        • Zusterzeel R.
        • Sanders W.
        • et al.
        Trends and outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in a community cohort.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4: 1189-1199
        • Tung R.
        • Vaseghi M.
        • Frankel D.S.
        • et al.
        Freedom from recurrent ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation is associated with improved survival in patients with structural heart disease: an International VT Ablation Center Collaborative Group study.
        Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12: 1997-2007
        • Cronin E.M.
        • Bogun F.M.
        • Maury P.
        • et al.
        2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.
        Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17: e2-e154
        • Stevenson W.G.
        • Wilber D.J.
        • Natale A.
        • et al.
        Irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction the multicenter thermocool ventricular tachycardia ablation trial.
        Circulation. 2008; 118: 2773-2782
        • Jaïs P.
        • Maury P.
        • Khairy P.
        • et al.
        Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia.
        Circulation. 2012; 125: 2184-2196
        • Saumarez R.C.
        • Camm A.J.
        • Panagos A.
        • et al.
        Ventricular fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with increased fractionation of paced right ventricular electrograms.
        Circulation. 1992; 86: 467-474
        • Josephson M.E.
        • Anter E.
        Substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia assumptions and misconceptions.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015; 1: 341-352
        • Martin R.
        • Maury P.
        • Bisceglia C.
        • et al.
        Characteristics of scar-related ventricular tachycardia circuits using ultra-high-density mapping.
        Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018; 11e006569
        • Martin C.A.
        • Sacher F.
        Extra-stimulus pacing: the key to targeting critical substrate in VT ablation?.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4: 328-330
        • Acosta J.
        • Andreu D.
        • Penela D.
        • et al.
        Elucidation of hidden slow conduction by double ventricular extrastimuli: a method for further arrhythmic substrate identification in ventricular tachycardia ablation procedures.
        Europace. 2018; 20: 337-346
        • Jackson N.
        • Gizurarson S.
        • Viswanathan K.
        • et al.
        Decrement evoked potential mapping: basis of a mechanistic strategy for ventricular tachycardia ablation.
        Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2015; 8: 1433-1442
        • de Riva M.
        • Naruse Y.
        • Ebert M.
        • et al.
        Targeting the hidden substrate unmasked by right ventricular extrastimulation improves ventricular tachycardia ablation outcome after myocardial infarction.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4: 316-327
        • Acosta J.
        • Soto-Iglesias D.
        • Jáuregui B.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcomes of ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation incorporating hidden slow conduction analysis.
        Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17: 1696-1703
        • Porta-Sánchez A.
        • Jackson N.
        • Lukac P.
        • et al.
        Multicenter study of ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation with decrement-evoked potential (DEEP) mapping with extra stimulus.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4: 307-315
        • Shariat M.H.
        • Gupta D.
        • Gul E.E.
        • et al.
        Ventricular substrate identification using close-coupled paced electrogram feature analysis.
        Europace. 2019; 21: 492-501
        • Caldwell J.
        • Gula L.
        • Ali F.S.
        • et al.
        Relative timing of near-field and far-field electrograms can determine the tachyarrhythmia site of origin.
        Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 530-535
        • Marchlinski F.E.
        • Callans D.J.
        • Gottlieb C.D.
        • Zado E.
        Linear ablation lesions for control of unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
        Circulation. 2000; 101: 1288-1296
        • Zehender M.
        • Brugada P.
        • Geibel A.
        • Waldecker B.
        • Stevenson W.
        • Wellens H.J.J.
        Programmed electrical stimulation in healed myocardial infarction using a standardized ventricular stimulation protocol.
        Am J Cardiol. 1987; 59: 578-585
        • Di Biase L.
        • Burkhardt J.D.
        • Lakkireddy D.
        • et al.
        Ablation of stable VTs versus substrate ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy: the VISTA randomized multicenter trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 2872-2882
        • Srinivasan N.T.
        • Garcia J.
        • Schilling R.J.
        • et al.
        Multicenter study of dynamic high-density functional substrate mapping improves identification of substrate targets for ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020; 6: 1783-1793
        • Frankel D.S.
        • Tung R.
        • Santangeli P.
        • et al.
        Sex and catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia: an International Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Center Collaborative Group study.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2016; 1: 938-944
        • Martin C.A.
        • Martin R.
        • Maury P.
        • et al.
        Effect of activation wavefront on electrogram characteristics during ventricular tachycardia ablation.
        Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2019; 12e007293
        • Mitchell L.B.
        • Wyse D.G.
        • Duff H.J.
        Programmed electrical stimulation studies for ventricular tachycardia induction in humans. I. The role of ventricular functional refractoriness in tachycardia induction.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 8: 567-575
        • Orini M.
        • Graham A.J.
        • Srinivasan N.T.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the reentry vulnerability index to predict ventricular tachycardia circuits using high-density contact mapping.
        Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17: 576-583