Advertisement

Effect of electrode size and spacing on electrograms: Optimized electrode configuration for near-field electrogram characterization

Published:September 14, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.09.011

      Background

      Detailed effects of electrode size on electrograms (EGMs) have not been systematically examined.

      Objectives

      We aimed to elucidate the effect of electrode size on EGMs and investigate an optimal configuration of electrode size and interelectrode spacing for gap detection and far-field reduction.

      Methods

      This study included 8 sheep in which probes with different electrode size and interelectrode spacing were epicardially placed on healthy, fatty, and lesion tissues for measurements. Between 3 electrode sizes (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.5 mm) with 3 mm spacing. As indices of capability in gap detection and far-field reduction, in different electrode sizes (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.5 mm) and interelectrode spacing (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.3 mm/0.5 mm/3 mm) and the optimized electrode size and interelectrode spacing were determined. Compared between PentaRay and the optimal probe determined in study 2.

      Results

      Study 1 demonstrated that unipolar voltage and the duration of EGMs increased as the electrode size increased in any tissue (P < .001). Bipolar EGMs had the same tendency in healthy/fat tissues, but not in lesions. Study 2 showed that significantly higher gap to lesion volume ratio and healthy to fat tissue voltage ratio were provided by a smaller electrode (0.2 mm or 0.3 mm electrode) and smaller spacing (0.1 mm spacing), but 0.3 mm electrode/0.1 mm spacing provided a larger bipolar voltage (P < .05). Study 3 demonstrated that 0.3 mm electrode/0.1 mm spacing provided less deflection with more discrete EGMs (P < .0001) with longer and more reproducible AF cycle length (P < .0001) compared to PentaRay.

      Conclusion

      Electrode size affects both unipolar and bipolar EGMs. Catheters with microelectrodes and very small interelectrode spacing may be superior in gap detection and far-field reduction. Importantly, this electrode configuration could dramatically reduce artifactual complex fractionated atrial electrograms and may open a new era for AF mapping.

      Graphical abstract

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart Rhythm
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Patel A.M.
        • d’Avila A.
        • Neuzil P.
        • et al.
        Atrial tachycardia after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: identification of the critical isthmus with a combination of multielectrode activation mapping and targeted entrainment mapping.
        Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008; 1: 14-22
        • Jaïs P.
        • Maury P.
        • Khairy P.
        • et al.
        Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia.
        Circulation. 2012; 125: 2184-2196
        • Tung R.
        • Nakahara S.
        • Maccabelli G.
        • et al.
        Ultra high-density multipolar mapping with double ventricular access: a novel technique for ablation of ventricular tachycardia.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011; 22: 49-56
        • Leshem E.
        • Tschabrunn C.M.
        • Jang J.
        • et al.
        High-resolution mapping of ventricular: evaluation of a novel integrated multielectrode mapping and ablation catheter.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017; 3: 220-231
        • Tschabrunn C.M.
        • Roujol S.
        • Dorman N.C.
        • Nezafat R.
        • Josephson M.E.
        • Anter E.
        High-resolution mapping of ventricular: comparison between single and multielectrode catheters.
        Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9: 1-11
        • Berte B.
        • Relan J.
        • Sacher F.
        • et al.
        Impact of electrode type on mapping of scar-related VT.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26: 1213-1223
        • Takigawa M.
        • Relan J.
        • Martin R.
        • et al.
        Detailed analysis of the relation between bipolar electrode spacing and far- and near-field electrograms.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019; 5: 66-77
        • Anter E.
        • Tschabrunn C.M.
        • Josephson M.E.
        High-resolution mapping of scar-related atrial arrhythmias using smaller electrodes with closer interelectrode spacing.
        Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015; 8: 537-545
        • Specter P.
        Electrical activity, electrodes, and electrograms.
        1st ed. Understanding Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Conceptually Guided Approach. UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2016: 59-67
        • Nademanee K.
        • McKenzie J.
        • Kosar E.
        • et al.
        A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 2044-2053
        • Takigawa M.
        • Martin R.
        • Cheniti G.
        • et al.
        Detailed comparison between the wall thickness and voltages in chronic myocardial infarction.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019; 30: 195-204
        • Kalifa J.
        • Tanaka K.
        • Zaitsev A.V.
        • et al.
        Mechanisms of wave fractionation at boundaries of high-frequency excitation in the posterior left atrium of the isolated sheep heart during atrial fibrillation.
        Circulation. 2006; 113: 626-633
        • Lin J.
        • Scherlag B.J.
        • Zhou J.
        • et al.
        Autonomic mechanism to explain complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE).
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18: 1197-1205