Advertisement

Optimizing atrial sensing parameters in leadless pacemakers: Atrioventricular synchrony achievement in the real world

Published:August 08, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.08.007

      Background

      Performance of the leadless pacemaker capable of atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing in de novo patients warrants further investigation.

      Objective

      The aims of this study were to assess what programming changes are needed to achieve proper atrial tracking and to study the percentage of AV synchrony (AVS) the device can provide under real-world conditions.

      Methods

      Consecutive patients undergoing Micra AV implantation between June 2020 and November 2021 were studied. Reprogramming of atrial sensing parameters during follow-up was performed by following device counters. AVS was studied with an ambulatory 24-hour Holter monitor and automatically analyzed by an electrocardiogram delineation system. The primary end point was AVS ≥85% of total cardiac cycles during 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram monitoring.

      Results

      Thirty-one patients who remained in VDD mode were studied, and all of them required manual reprogramming. The automatic A3 window end was deactivated, and a fixed and short value was set in all patients throughout follow-up. AVS significantly increased from 68.7% ± 14.7% at 24-hour follow-up to 83.9% ± 7.4% at 1-month visit (P = .001). At 1-month visit, shorter A3 window end time (P = .019), higher A4 threshold (P = .011), and deactivation of the automatic A3 window (P = .054) were independently related to higher AVS. A total of 2,291,953 Holter-recorded cardiac cycles were analyzed. Median AVS during 24-hour daily activities was 87.6% (interquartile range 84.5%–90.6%). Twenty of 26 patients (79.6%) reached AVS ≥85% of cardiac cycles.

      Conclusion

      High rates of AVS can be achieved in real-world patients undergoing leadless pacing. Manual reprogramming of the atrial sensing parameters is essential to optimize mechanically sensed atrial tracking.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart Rhythm
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dorian P.
        • Philippon F.
        • Thibault B.
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled study of detection enhancements versus rate-only detection to prevent inappropriate therapy in a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
        Heart Rhythm. 2004; 1: 540-547
        • El-Chami M.F.
        • Al-Samadi F.
        • Clementy N.
        • et al.
        Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: a comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control.
        Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 1800-1807
        • Cano Pérez Ó.
        • Pombo Jiménez M.
        • Lorente Carreño D.
        • Chimeno García J.
        Spanish Pacemaker Registry: 16th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2018).
        Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019; 72: 944-953
        • Lamas G.A.
        • Orav E.J.
        • Stambler B.S.
        • et al.
        Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing.
        N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 1097-1104
        • Kerr C.R.
        • Connolly S.J.
        • Abdollah H.
        • et al.
        Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing. Effects of physiological pacing during long-term follow-up.
        Circulation. 2004; 109: 357-362
        • Chinitz L.
        • Ritter P.
        • Khelae S.K.
        • et al.
        Accelerometer-based atrioventricular synchronous pacing with a ventricular leadless pacemaker: results from the Micra atrioventricular feasibility studies.
        Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 1363-1371
        • Steinwender C.
        • Khelae S.K.
        • Garweg C.
        • et al.
        Atrioventricular synchronous pacing using a leadless ventricular pacemaker: results from the MARVEL 2 study.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020; 6: 94-106
        • European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
        European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association.
        Europace. 2013; 15: 1070-1118
        • Ritter P.
        • Duray G.Z.
        • Steinwender C.
        • et al.
        Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.
        Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 2510-2519
        • Martínez J.P.
        • Almeida R.
        • Olmos S.
        • Rocha A.P.
        • Laguna P.
        A wavelet-based ECG delineator: evaluation on standard databases.
        IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004; 51: 570-581
        • Arps K.
        • Piccini J.P.
        • Yapejian R.
        • et al.
        Optimizing mechanically sensed atrial tracking in patients with atrioventricular-synchronous leadless pacemakers: a single-center experience.
        Heart Rhythm O2. 2021; 2: 455-462
        • Garweg C.
        • Khelae S.K.
        • Steinwender C.
        • et al.
        Predictors of atrial mechanical sensing and atrioventricular synchrony with a leadless ventricular pacemaker: results from the MARVEL 2 study.
        Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17: 2037-2045
        • Neugebauer F.
        • Noti F.
        • van Gool S.
        • et al.
        Leadless atrioventricular synchronous pacing in an outpatient setting: early lessons learned on factors affecting atrioventricular synchrony.
        Heart Rhythm. 2022; 19: 748-756
        • Antonioli G.E.
        • Ansani L.
        • Barbieri D.
        • Guardigli G.
        • Percoco G.F.
        • Toselli T.
        Italian multicenter study on a single lead VDD pacing system using a narrow atrial dipole spacing.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992; 15: 1890-1893