Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) reduces adverse outcomes,
1
but ascertaining left bundle branch (LBB) capture with a programmer to conduct threshold
testing and multiple 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) to assess for QRS transitions
during differential pacing is cumbersome and inefficient.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Heart RhythmAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
Tan ESJ, Soh R, Lee J-Y, et al. Clinical outcomes in conduction system pacing compared to right ventricular pacing in bradycardia [published online ahead of print November 30, 2022]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2022.10.016.
- Use of extendable helix leads for conduction system pacing: differences in lead handling and performance lead design impacts conduction system pacing.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 33: 1550-1557
- ECG and pacing criteria for differentiating conduction system pacing from myocardial pacing.Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021; 10: 172-180
- Predictors of loss of capture in left bundle branch pacing: a multicenter experience.Heart Rhythm. 2022; 19: 1757-1758
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 28, 2023
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Funding Sources: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Identification
Copyright
© 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.
