x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Clinical Guidelines & Documents
- Russo, Andrea MRemove Russo, Andrea M filter
- ACCFRemove ACCF filter
- Pacemaker modeRemove Pacemaker mode filter
Keyword
- AF1
- AHA1
- American College of Cardiology Foundation1
- American Heart Association1
- atrial fibrillation1
- atrioventricular1
- AV1
- AV block1
- CI1
- confidence interval1
- hazard ratio1
- Heart Rhythm Society1
- HR1
- HRS1
- ICD1
- implantable cardioverter defibrillator1
- QALY1
- quality-adjusted life year1
- Sinus node disease1
- sinus node dysfunction1
- SND1
- ventricular tachycardia1
- VT1
Clinical Guidelines & Documents
1 Results
- News from the Heart Rhythm Society
HRS/ACCF Expert Consensus Statement on Pacemaker Device and Mode Selection: Developed in partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Heart RhythmVol. 9Issue 8p1344–1365Published in issue: August, 2012- Anne M. Gillis
- Andrea M. Russo
- Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
- Charles D. Swerdlow
- Brian Olshansky
- Sana M. Al-Khatib
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 48The most recent American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (ACCF/AHA/HRS) guidelines related to pacemaker implantation were published as part of a larger document related to device-based therapy.1 While this document provides some comments on pacemaker mode selection and algorithms to guide selection, it does not provide specific recommendations regarding choices for single- or dual-chamber devices. Over the past 15 years multiple randomized trials have compared a number of cardiovascular outcomes among patients randomized to atrial or dual-chamber pacing vs those randomized to ventricular pacing.