x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Clinical Guidelines & Documents
- AVRemove AV filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2012 and 2021.
Author
- Aguinaga, Luis3
- Al-Khatib, Sana M3
- Calkins, Hugh3
- Chung, Mina K3
- Abrams, Dominic J2
- Ackerman, Michael J2
- Anter, Elad2
- Balaji, Seshadri2
- Beach, Cheyenne M2
- Benjamin, Monica N2
- Berruezo, Antonio2
- Berul, Charles I2
- Bogun, Frank M2
- Callans, David J2
- Cannon, Bryan2
- Cecchin, Frank2
- Chen, Minglong2
- Cohen, Mitchell I2
- Cronin, Edmond M2
- Cuculich, Phillip2
- D'Avila, Andre2
- Dalal, Aarti S2
- Darrieux, Francisco CC2
- Daubert, James P2
- DePasquale, Eugene C2
Clinical Guidelines & Documents
8 Results
- News from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology SocietyOpen Access
2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients
Heart RhythmVol. 18Issue 11p1888–1924Published online: July 29, 2021- Writing Committee Members
- Maully J. Shah
- Michael J. Silka
- Jennifer N. Avari Silva
- Seshadri Balaji
- Cheyenne M. Beach
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 19In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. - News from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology SocietyOpen Access
2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients: Executive Summary
Heart RhythmVol. 18Issue 11p1925–1950Published online: July 29, 2021- Writing Committee Members
- Michael J. Silka
- Maully J. Shah
- Jennifer N. Avari Silva
- Seshadri Balaji
- Cheyenne M. Beach
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 10Document Reviewers: Philip M. Chang, MD, FHRS, FACC; Fabrizio Drago, MD, FAIAC; Anne M. Dubin, MD, FHRS; Susan P. Etheridge, MD, FHRS; Apichai Kongpatanayothin, MD, FAsCC; Jose Manuel Moltedo, MD, FACC; Ashish A. Nabar, MD, DNB, PhD, FISE; George F. Van Hare, MD, FHRS, FACC, FAAP - Practice Guidelines
2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: Executive summary
Heart RhythmVol. 16Issue 11e373–e407Published in issue: November, 2019- Jeffrey A. Towbin
- William J. McKenna
- Dominic J. Abrams
- Michael J. Ackerman
- Hugh Calkins
- Francisco C.C. Darrieux
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 120Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. - News From the Heart Rhythm SocietyOpen Access
2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias
Heart RhythmVol. 17Issue 1e2–e154Published online: May 10, 2019- Edmond M. Cronin
- Frank M. Bogun
- Philippe Maury
- Petr Peichl
- Minglong Chen
- Narayanan Namboodiri
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 124Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. - News From the Heart Rhythm Society
2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary
Heart RhythmVol. 17Issue 1e155–e205Published online: May 10, 2019- Edmond M. Cronin
- Frank M. Bogun
- Philippe Maury
- Petr Peichl
- Minglong Chen
- Narayanan Namboodiri
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 61Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. - Practice Guidelines
2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
Heart RhythmVol. 16Issue 11e301–e372Published online: May 9, 2019- Jeffrey A. Towbin
- William J. McKenna
- Dominic J. Abrams
- Michael J. Ackerman
- Hugh Calkins
- Francisco C.C. Darrieux
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 286Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. - News from the Heart Rhythm SocietyOpen Access
2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
Heart RhythmVol. 14Issue 10e275–e444Published online: May 15, 2017- Hugh Calkins
- Gerhard Hindricks
- Riccardo Cappato
- Young-Hoon Kim
- Eduardo B. Saad
- Luis Aguinaga
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1100During the past three decades, catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) have evolved from investigational procedures to their current role as effective treatment options for patients with AF. Surgical ablation of AF, using either standard, minimally invasive, or hybrid techniques, is available in most major hospitals throughout the world. Catheter ablation of AF is even more widely available, and is now the most commonly performed catheter ablation procedure. - News from the Heart Rhythm Society
HRS/ACCF Expert Consensus Statement on Pacemaker Device and Mode Selection: Developed in partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Heart RhythmVol. 9Issue 8p1344–1365Published in issue: August, 2012- Anne M. Gillis
- Andrea M. Russo
- Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
- Charles D. Swerdlow
- Brian Olshansky
- Sana M. Al-Khatib
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 48The most recent American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (ACCF/AHA/HRS) guidelines related to pacemaker implantation were published as part of a larger document related to device-based therapy.1 While this document provides some comments on pacemaker mode selection and algorithms to guide selection, it does not provide specific recommendations regarding choices for single- or dual-chamber devices. Over the past 15 years multiple randomized trials have compared a number of cardiovascular outcomes among patients randomized to atrial or dual-chamber pacing vs those randomized to ventricular pacing.