x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Clinical Guidelines & Documents
- Al-Khatib, Sana MRemove Al-Khatib, Sana M filter
- atrial fibrillationRemove atrial fibrillation filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2012 and 2019.
Author
- Aguinaga, Luis2
- Ellenbogen, Kenneth A2
- Russo, Andrea M2
- Swerdlow, Charles D2
- Almendral, Jesús1
- Anter, Elad1
- Berger, Ronald D1
- Berruezo, Antonio1
- Beshai, John F1
- Bogun, Frank M1
- Callans, David J1
- Chen, Minglong1
- Chung, Mina K1
- Cronin, Edmond M1
- Cuculich, Phillip1
- Cuesta, Alejandro1
- D'Avila, Andre1
- Daubert, James P1
- Deal, Barbara J1
- Della Bella, Paolo1
- Deneke, Thomas1
- Dickfeld, Timm-Michael1
- Dubner, Sergio1
- Fauchier, Laurent1
Clinical Guidelines & Documents
3 Results
- News From the Heart Rhythm SocietyOpen Access
2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias
Heart RhythmVol. 17Issue 1e2–e154Published online: May 10, 2019- Edmond M. Cronin
- Frank M. Bogun
- Philippe Maury
- Petr Peichl
- Minglong Chen
- Narayanan Namboodiri
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 117Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. - Practice Guidelines
2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing
Heart RhythmVol. 13Issue 2e50–e86Published online: November 19, 2015- Bruce L. Wilkoff
- Laurent Fauchier
- Martin K. Stiles
- Carlos A. Morillo
- Sana M. Al-Khatib
- Jesús Almendral
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 159Document Reviewers: Giuseppe Boriani, MD, PhD (Italy); Michele Brignole, MD, FESC (Italy); Alan Cheng, MD, FHRS (USA); Thomas C. Crawford, MD, FACC, FHRS (USA); Luigi Di Biase, MD, PhD, FACC, FHRS (USA); Kevin Donahue, MD (USA); Andrew E. Epstein, MD, FAHA, FACC, FHRS (USA); Michael E. Field, MD, FACC, FHRS (USA); Bulent Gorenek, MD, FACC, FESC (Turkey); Jin-Long Huang, MD, PhD (China); Julia H. Indik, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS (USA); Carsten W. Israel, MD (Germany); Mariell L. Jessup MD, FACC, FAHA, FESC (USA); Christophe Leclercq, MD, PhD (France); Robert J. - News from the Heart Rhythm Society
HRS/ACCF Expert Consensus Statement on Pacemaker Device and Mode Selection: Developed in partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Heart RhythmVol. 9Issue 8p1344–1365Published in issue: August, 2012- Anne M. Gillis
- Andrea M. Russo
- Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
- Charles D. Swerdlow
- Brian Olshansky
- Sana M. Al-Khatib
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 48The most recent American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (ACCF/AHA/HRS) guidelines related to pacemaker implantation were published as part of a larger document related to device-based therapy.1 While this document provides some comments on pacemaker mode selection and algorithms to guide selection, it does not provide specific recommendations regarding choices for single- or dual-chamber devices. Over the past 15 years multiple randomized trials have compared a number of cardiovascular outcomes among patients randomized to atrial or dual-chamber pacing vs those randomized to ventricular pacing.