x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Clinical Guidelines & Documents
- LGERemove LGE filter
- Open AccessRemove Open Access filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2017 and 2021.
Author
- Aguinaga, Luis3
- Chung, Mina K3
- Akar, Joseph G2
- Badhwar, Vinay2
- Balaji, Seshadri2
- Beach, Cheyenne M2
- Benjamin, Monica N2
- Berul, Charles I2
- Brugada, Josep2
- Calkins, Hugh2
- Camm, John2
- Cannon, Bryan2
- Cappato, Riccardo2
- Cecchin, Frank2
- Chen, Peng-Sheng2
- Chen, Shih-Ann2
- Cohen, Mitchell I2
- Curtis, Anne B2
- D'Avila, André2
- Dalal, Aarti S2
- Davies, D Wyn2
- Day, John D2
- Dechert, Brynn E2
- Di Biase, Luigi2
- Duytschaever, Mattias2
Clinical Guidelines & Documents
5 Results
- News from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology SocietyOpen Access
2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients
Heart RhythmVol. 18Issue 11p1888–1924Published online: July 29, 2021- Writing Committee Members
- Maully J. Shah
- Michael J. Silka
- Jennifer N. Avari Silva
- Seshadri Balaji
- Cheyenne M. Beach
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 17In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. - News from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology SocietyOpen Access
2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients: Executive Summary
Heart RhythmVol. 18Issue 11p1925–1950Published online: July 29, 2021- Writing Committee Members
- Michael J. Silka
- Maully J. Shah
- Jennifer N. Avari Silva
- Seshadri Balaji
- Cheyenne M. Beach
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 8Document Reviewers: Philip M. Chang, MD, FHRS, FACC; Fabrizio Drago, MD, FAIAC; Anne M. Dubin, MD, FHRS; Susan P. Etheridge, MD, FHRS; Apichai Kongpatanayothin, MD, FAsCC; Jose Manuel Moltedo, MD, FACC; Ashish A. Nabar, MD, DNB, PhD, FISE; George F. Van Hare, MD, FHRS, FACC, FAAP - News From the Heart Rhythm SocietyOpen Access
2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias
Heart RhythmVol. 17Issue 1e2–e154Published online: May 10, 2019- Edmond M. Cronin
- Frank M. Bogun
- Philippe Maury
- Petr Peichl
- Minglong Chen
- Narayanan Namboodiri
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 117Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. - News from the Heart Rhythm SocietyOpen Access
2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary
Heart RhythmVol. 14Issue 10e445–e494Published online: September 15, 2017- Hugh Calkins
- Gerhard Hindricks
- Riccardo Cappato
- Young-Hoon Kim
- Eduardo B. Saad
- Luis Aguinaga
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 163During the past three decades, catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) have evolved from investigational procedures to their current role as effective treatment options for patients with AF. Surgical ablation of AF, using either standard, minimally invasive, or hybrid techniques, is available in most major hospitals throughout the world. Catheter ablation of AF is even more widely available, and is now the most commonly performed catheter ablation procedure. - News from the Heart Rhythm SocietyOpen Access
2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
Heart RhythmVol. 14Issue 10e275–e444Published online: May 15, 2017- Hugh Calkins
- Gerhard Hindricks
- Riccardo Cappato
- Young-Hoon Kim
- Eduardo B. Saad
- Luis Aguinaga
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1066During the past three decades, catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) have evolved from investigational procedures to their current role as effective treatment options for patients with AF. Surgical ablation of AF, using either standard, minimally invasive, or hybrid techniques, is available in most major hospitals throughout the world. Catheter ablation of AF is even more widely available, and is now the most commonly performed catheter ablation procedure.