x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Hands On
- Epstein, Laurence MRemove Epstein, Laurence M filter
- Lead extractionRemove Lead extraction filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2007 and 2019.
Hands On
2 Results
- Hands On
When bigger is better: Novel use of a 27 F leadless pacemaker delivery sheath for femoral lead extractions
Heart RhythmVol. 17Issue 1p152–157Published online: July 5, 2019- James Gabriels
- David Chang
- Joseph Donnelly
- Beom Soo Kim
- Jonathan Willner
- Stuart Beldner
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1As the implantation rate of cardiac implantable electronic devices has continued to increase, lead extractions for clinical indications such as infection, lead failure, and lead recall have also increased.1 A femoral approach to transvenous lead extractions is needed when removing previously cut and abandoned leads, leads that disrupt during a superior extraction attempt and in some cases involving central venous obstruction.2 - Hands on
How to select patients for lead extraction
Heart RhythmVol. 4Issue 7p978–985Published online: June 8, 2007- Michael E. Field
- Samuel O. Jones
- Laurence M. Epstein
Cited in Scopus: 32The techniques and tools for percutaneous removal of transvenous leads have undergone substantial development over the past several decades. Although the use of locking stylets and powered sheaths to free leads from encapsulated scar tissue has improved the success rate, the procedure still carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality even in the hands of experienced operators. The threshold for lead extraction continues to evolve. The initial use of the procedure was limited to patients with life-threatening infections because of limited tools, lower success rates and high complication rates.